by jdunks » Wed May 16, 2018 10:50 am
Thanks so much for the feedback. I have some questions - not being argumentative, I'm sure you're right, but I'm just trying to clarify my confusion.
New coniferous trees downwind of the restaurant serve no purpose....same for the new ones west of the main drive....they are not upwind of the PP. I see that the ones by the lake are not needed, but the others do seem like they're upwind of the PP to me - wouldn't I have another gap in wind protection without those? Or is the restaurant providing the wind break?
Forcing service vehicles through the parking area is poor design logic. So if the service road brings in dedicated paving of its own, that's preferable, even though there's additional paving? I though minimal paving would trump over the poor design factor.
Could you also help me understand the no shade on the PP rule? Am I ok as long as I don't put conifers to the south of the PP?
Again, thanks for your help.