NCARB Practice Problem

Structural Layout Vignette and Multiple Choice

NCARB Practice Problem

Postby k4dm0nky » Sun Sep 22, 2013 7:19 am

Image

I can't figure this out...

I broke down the shape to individual pieces and got .5 + .5 + 42.7 = 43.7 / 5 ... and that does not equal the question in the back of the guide? What am I doing wrong? Testing tommorow and feel like I am up $hits creek without a paddle!!!! :x
User avatar
k4dm0nky
 
Posts: 338
Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 2:04 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Re: NCARB Practice Problem

Postby Mike-SE » Sun Sep 22, 2013 8:10 am

I have no idea what your numbers represent.
This problem is easy BUT you can screw up similar problems if you do not understand.
The shape is symmetrical about the X axis. So you can take the I of the 6" x 8" rectangle and subtract the I of the two 2.5" x 8" rectangles.
IF it were not symmetrical it would be way more difficult, too difficult for the ARE.
All the best tomorrow. Let me know what time you test and I will pray for you at the start and end.
Mike-SE
 
Posts: 1108
Joined: Fri May 31, 2013 7:10 pm

Re: NCARB Practice Problem

Postby k4dm0nky » Sun Sep 22, 2013 11:27 am

Thanks Mike! I test at 2pm! :shock:

I guess I know how to do it for a rectangles

What I did was separated the flanges from the web for Sx and then summed them all up.

Top Flange
6(1)^3 / 12 = .5

Bottom Flange
6(1)^3 / 12 = .5

Web
1(8)^3 / 12 = 42.7

Total Sum = 43.7

42.7 +.5 +.5 = 43.7 / 5 (centroid) = 8.7

but that is wrong. I don't know why that way. I got the way you did it so if I see it tomorrow I will be doing it that way. Makes sense. Thanks again Mike as always! God bless
User avatar
k4dm0nky
 
Posts: 338
Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 2:04 pm
Location: Detroit, MI

Re: NCARB Practice Problem

Postby acadia » Sun Sep 22, 2013 6:10 pm

Why don't we subtract the two 2.5 rectangles from the overall 10x6?
K4dm0nky good luck!
acadia
 
Posts: 102
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 10:12 am

Re: NCARB Practice Problem

Postby jaraga » Wed Sep 25, 2013 12:50 pm

I know exactly how you feel since I was making the same "mistake". I did that because based on KAPLAN's study material you have to do it that way (that is, in pieces, so small rec 1st, then 2nd then 3rd, finally add'em up)... I was just as frustrated and asked around in the office and no one even knew what the hell a section modulus was... go figure...
But doing it the way it was proposed here, it makes sense.
jaraga
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 2:50 pm


Return to SS - STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests

cron