IL NCARB version

Interior Layout & Building Layout Vignettes

IL NCARB version

Postby JamesCalaway3 » Tue Apr 18, 2017 11:30 am

This is my first post - I'd appreciate any feedback
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
JamesCalaway3
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2017 8:44 am

Re: IL NCARB version

Postby sbyrktct » Tue Apr 18, 2017 12:37 pm

- missing RBO-LCR door
User avatar
sbyrktct
 
Posts: 1891
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 9:35 am
Location: http://arehelp.webs.com/

Re: IL NCARB version

Postby JamesCalaway3 » Tue Apr 18, 2017 1:08 pm

Yep, I'm going to assume that would be a major error. Thanks for catching it. I must have had my blinders on. Please see corrections - I think I have it now. Thanks again.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
JamesCalaway3
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2017 8:44 am

Re: IL NCARB version

Postby sbyrktct » Wed Apr 19, 2017 5:17 am

- T44 blocks access to north end of JO
- why did you make CR smaller? sliver of RBO floor is odd
User avatar
sbyrktct
 
Posts: 1891
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 9:35 am
Location: http://arehelp.webs.com/

Re: IL NCARB version

Postby JamesCalaway3 » Wed Apr 19, 2017 10:03 am

Sbyrktct - thanks for all of the feedback. I fixed the sliver (probably would have been a major inaccessibility read by the computer) and the access to JO's office.

Could you offer some feedback on the BL for my first pass as well?

Also, when calculating the max 25% corridor area, do we need to consider the Lobby in our calculation or strictly corridor only? Thanks for all the help.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
JamesCalaway3
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2017 8:44 am

Re: IL NCARB version

Postby sbyrktct » Wed Apr 19, 2017 10:38 am

IL
- looks good

BL
- why are LR's stacked north-south? MP/OB would be better shape if they were east-west & ST slid south
- what size is your E? looks big... E & EE should be same sf & square
- fyi for future practice (& maybe the exam) TR's don't need to be stacked
User avatar
sbyrktct
 
Posts: 1891
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 9:35 am
Location: http://arehelp.webs.com/

Re: IL NCARB version

Postby JamesCalaway3 » Wed Apr 19, 2017 12:33 pm

All good points. I made some careless errors. I'll need to do some double checking during the exam. Thanks for weighing in.
JamesCalaway3
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2017 8:44 am

Re: IL NCARB version

Postby JamesCalaway3 » Sat Apr 22, 2017 6:09 pm

Does anyone know what the clearance requirement is for secretary desks when you position them back to back? I would assume this would work, but wanted to double check. Thanks.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
JamesCalaway3
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2017 8:44 am

Re: IL NCARB version

Postby sbyrktct » Mon Apr 24, 2017 9:59 am

This works.
These desks can be positioned against a wall on any side.
The only clearance needed for this desk is adequate access to get to the chair.
User avatar
sbyrktct
 
Posts: 1891
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 9:35 am
Location: http://arehelp.webs.com/


Return to SD - SCHEMATIC DESIGN

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests

cron