Sparky83 wrote:A walk crossing a drive is not continuous as required and is a safety issue.
Missing a walk to the public walk.
New trees south of the service drive serve no purpose.
Don't allow new trees to block any of the view of the pond from the restaurant.
jyll wrote:Sparky83 wrote:A walk crossing a drive is not continuous as required and is a safety issue.
Missing a walk to the public walk.
New trees south of the service drive serve no purpose.
Don't allow new trees to block any of the view of the pond from the restaurant.
@Sparky83 if no trees are placed west of service entrance, would you consider it visible office main entrance?
VVK wrote:A walk crossing a drive is not continuous as required and is a safety issue.
Thanks for the comments. I did take off the walk which crossing the drive way. see updated vignette.
if i propose a walk which crossing the drive way is that a failing design? i just want to people to easy access to PP. Not all errors are fatal.
Missing a walk to the public walk.
yes! i added the walk to PP.
New trees south of the service drive serve no purpose.
the purpose of placing the these trees was blocking the view of parking lot from street. That doesn't make any sense. How would trees south of the service drive do that, and there is no such requirement in the program.
Don't allow new trees to block any of the view of the pond from the restaurant.
yes. new tress blocking the view of pond from restaurant removed.
Thank you again your comments and i do appreciate it. Please review the new two option Vignette.
New plan is much better, but view of the pond from the restaurant is still partially blocked.
@Sparky83 if no trees are placed west of service entrance, would you consider it visible office main entrance? Don't understand the question.
VVK wrote:Site Design Vignette 2
Return to SPD - SITE PLANNING & DESIGN
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests