by ccolley12 » Thu Apr 04, 2019 12:49 pm
Like many aspects of design, there is no singular correct answer to this. There are more efficient and less efficient ways to resist lateral loads.. so the way a specific question is worded is important.
First, X bracing is there to resist lateral forces... wind and seismic are the primary lateral forces that act on a building. Seismic is often the strongest load and so it typically governs the lateral design and thus often times people refer to X bracing as seismic bracing... but really, it is lateral bracing. There are many types of lateral bracing systems... X bracing refers to the shape of the diagonal braces within a steel frame... some engineers refer more generically to these frames as simply Braced Frames (BF). They could be chevron shaped, K shaped, etc. In some light structures, the bracing is actually steel rods, though they are typically HSS or WF steel shapes. The diagonal members, regardless of shape or orientation are all designed to be in tension and thus they often are paired as an X, that way depending on which direction the lateral force is coming from, one of the members will always be in tension.
In terms of placement, the number and location are largely dependent on 2 main factors; the geometry (shape) of the building footprint and the type/strength of the lateral load itself. Assuming a mostly rectilinear building and a desire to use the most efficient system, frames should be placed at the building perimeter, on all 4 sides and roughly in the middle of each side. In the case of a multi-story building, the frames should be aligned floor to floor.
If the building footprint is irregular, I typically try to break it into squares/rectangles and then follow the rules above as best as one can. This will get you close... close enough that a structural engineer won't totally laugh at you!