3.18.2 said: "It is not unsual for an injured worker to seed redress from the owner or architect, since statutory compensation awards are typically rather low.
This section (3.18.2) makes it clear that such compensational awards should not be construed to limit the contractors indemnity obligation to
to the payment of statutory worker's compensation benefits in the event the owner or architects is found liable for the accidents due to the contractor's negligence."
Before going the maze of legal bolero/tango on the preface of the above, can someone please give me
an real life example of when "the owner or architects is found liable for the accidents due to the
contractor's negligence" ? I scratched my head MANY times...When the contractor IS found
negligent, then IT IS the contractor's liability, isn't that right ?