hnQ_9999 wrote:Q: Is (c) redundant to (a), given "registered building designer" is surely confusingly similar to "architect" ?
Not really.
What you should understand is that California used to register building designers. That's why the APA has specific language regarding them. When RBD sunset in 1986, all remaining RBDs automatically became architects. Craig Ellwood was one of them.
If not, what "It is a misdemeanor, punishable as specified in subdivision (a)" only refers to the fine given in (a), "of not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than five thousand dollars ($5,000), or by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment"...AND "anyone" here, in section (c), INCLUDING licensed architect, can be fined by such punishment if caught using the term "registered building designer" ?
If an architect is that dumb, then yes.
I am pretty sure my interpretation is correct since the graphic examples of the stamps have not include such term. Otherwise (c) would have been written as:
(c) Otherwise licensed by the state as a building designer, it is a misdemeanor, punishable as specified in subdivision (a), for any person to advertise or represent that he or she is a "registered building designer" or is registered.
ANYONE ?
What?
mullengirl wrote:Is it against Architects Practice Act if a full time architect signs the drawings that she works as moonlight job?
Return to CALIFORNIA SUPPLEMENTAL EXAM
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests