by anonymous283 » Sat Feb 03, 2018 9:40 am
I have study material that tells me a201 extends rights and responsibilities from owner to contractor to subcontractor and from owner to architect to consultant (thats it - it does not say it can do this; it just says a201 does this). I got the following practice question: An Architect contracts with a Structural Engineer to provide structural engineering services for a project. Who is responsible to the Owner for the adequacy of the structural system? I answered architect and engineer because of that study material. The answer was just architect. I searched the a201 contract for the word consultant and read every instance. Not once does it describe extending rights and responsibilities. So is my study material wrong?